Titus J. Nez — Interview Q&A

≈ 7 min read · or listen, or skim the bold lines

B · From the record Summaries are drawn from Cal Nez’s interview. Quotations are not published until checked against the recording. How we verify →

Read by your own device — private, nothing sent anywhere.

Answer summaries in the site’s words, drawn from the recorded Cal Nez interview (Politics on the Navajo Nation, 2026) — not quotations and not the candidate’s own wording. Their exact words are in the video, linked from their profile.

← Candidate profile · Back to your comparison → (your lineup and marks are saved)

🔒 Everything on this page is private — reads, takes, lenses, and “did they answer” checks save only to your device and appear on your My Ballot Notes. Why mark as you go? Because you can explore by candidate or by issue — and your marks travel with each answer wherever it appears, so you never have to re-assess the same answer twice.

Platform & Economic Sovereignty

Cal asked: Lay out your platform — what are your top priorities?

Nez centers his platform on “economic sovereignty” and a Navajo-first approach: keeping Navajo money circulating in Navajo communities, expanding the Navajo Business Opportunity Act so tribal enterprises stop competing with private Navajo businesses, and building economic hubs along the I-40 corridor. He frames the long arc as generational independence from federal dependency.

Your take (private):

Did they answer the question?

Not sure how to weigh this answer? The five lenses, in brief ▾

Transparency & accountability: who is responsible, and how would progress be measured and verified?
Root cause: does this address the underlying problem, or only the symptom?
Culture — K’é / Hózhǫ: does it strengthen kinship, restore balance, honor future generations?
Collaboration: who would need to work together — and does the answer name them?
Prevention vs. damage control: does it prevent harm, or only respond after it?

Questions to carry with you — nothing to click, nothing scored. Full lesson: The Five Lenses · companion: How to weigh what a candidate says.

Governance History & Government Reform

Cal asked: Do you understand the history of the Navajo Nation government — Title 2 and the 1989 changes?

Nez traced the Peter MacDonald sovereignty era, the 1989 Title 2 amendments he argues left presidents largely ceremonial, and Albert Hale's local-empowerment plan he says was gutted into an unusable Title 26. He criticized turnover at the Office of Government Development and inconsistency in the courts, and proposed a citizen “fourth branch” of oversight.

Your take (private):

Did they answer the question?

Not sure how to weigh this answer? The five lenses, in brief ▾

Transparency & accountability: who is responsible, and how would progress be measured and verified?
Root cause: does this address the underlying problem, or only the symptom?
Culture — K’é / Hózhǫ: does it strengthen kinship, restore balance, honor future generations?
Collaboration: who would need to work together — and does the answer name them?
Prevention vs. damage control: does it prevent harm, or only respond after it?

Questions to carry with you — nothing to click, nothing scored. Full lesson: The Five Lenses · companion: How to weigh what a candidate says.

The Budget & the Missing $24M

Cal asked: How did the $24 million happen, and what can the Council actually do?

Nez argued appropriations should carry “strings” — conditions and reporting tied to the money — and pushed closing loopholes, a Title 12 (fiscal) revamp, and segregation of duties so funds can't move without accountability.

Your take (private):

Did they answer the question?

Not sure how to weigh this answer? The five lenses, in brief ▾

Transparency & accountability: who is responsible, and how would progress be measured and verified?
Root cause: does this address the underlying problem, or only the symptom?
Culture — K’é / Hózhǫ: does it strengthen kinship, restore balance, honor future generations?
Collaboration: who would need to work together — and does the answer name them?
Prevention vs. damage control: does it prevent harm, or only respond after it?

Questions to carry with you — nothing to click, nothing scored. Full lesson: The Five Lenses · companion: How to weigh what a candidate says.

Land Status & Land-Back

Cal asked: What about land — trust land, restricted-fee, the checkerboard around Gallup?

Nez wants trust and restricted-fee land returned to the chapters that surround it, supports buying back non-Navajo land around Gallup, and would return the Church Rock Industrial Park (and its casino tax revenue) to the local chapter. He did not go into grazing or homesite-lease mechanics.

Your take (private):

Did they answer the question?

Not sure how to weigh this answer? The five lenses, in brief ▾

Transparency & accountability: who is responsible, and how would progress be measured and verified?
Root cause: does this address the underlying problem, or only the symptom?
Culture — K’é / Hózhǫ: does it strengthen kinship, restore balance, honor future generations?
Collaboration: who would need to work together — and does the answer name them?
Prevention vs. damage control: does it prevent harm, or only respond after it?

Questions to carry with you — nothing to click, nothing scored. Full lesson: The Five Lenses · companion: How to weigh what a candidate says.

Healthcare & 638

Cal asked: Do you support 638? Where is the oversight?

Nez supported 638 across police, schools, and health, citing the Lumbee recognition debate, ; asked about the host’s point that HEHSC receives only one report a year from each 638 facility, he pointed instead to Law & Order Committee oversight of 638 law enforcement and its Washington lobbying for 638 funding. He raised off-reservation Indian Health Service (IHS) access under the Treaty of 1868 and extended PTSD treatment for veterans.

Your take (private):

Did they answer the question?

Not sure how to weigh this answer? The five lenses, in brief ▾

Transparency & accountability: who is responsible, and how would progress be measured and verified?
Root cause: does this address the underlying problem, or only the symptom?
Culture — K’é / Hózhǫ: does it strengthen kinship, restore balance, honor future generations?
Collaboration: who would need to work together — and does the answer name them?
Prevention vs. damage control: does it prevent harm, or only respond after it?

Questions to carry with you — nothing to click, nothing scored. Full lesson: The Five Lenses · companion: How to weigh what a candidate says.

Enterprises & Economic Development

Cal asked: What about the Nation's enterprises, and getting Navajos into business?

Nez would expand the Navajo Business Opportunity Act (NBOA) and shift opportunity from the enterprises toward private Navajo businesses — he criticized American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)-era contracts going to enterprises like NECA while entrepreneurs were left out (“we’re pumping money into enterprises”), proposed a Navajo bank capitalized by the Nation to issue seed loans, and would build economic hubs along I-40 and the highway corridors in his district.

Your take (private):

Did they answer the question?

Not sure how to weigh this answer? The five lenses, in brief ▾

Transparency & accountability: who is responsible, and how would progress be measured and verified?
Root cause: does this address the underlying problem, or only the symptom?
Culture — K’é / Hózhǫ: does it strengthen kinship, restore balance, honor future generations?
Collaboration: who would need to work together — and does the answer name them?
Prevention vs. damage control: does it prevent harm, or only respond after it?

Questions to carry with you — nothing to click, nothing scored. Full lesson: The Five Lenses · companion: How to weigh what a candidate says.

See something to correct? Email a correction.