2026 Candidate — President

Andrew Curley Interviewed

B · From the record   Summaries are drawn from Cal Nez’s interview. Quotations are not published until checked against the recording. How we verify →

Read by your own device — private, nothing sent anywhere.

Read the full profile →

Office sought
President, Navajo Nation
Home chapter
Houck Chapter, Fort Defiance Agency
Background
Associate Professor, University of Arizona; PhD Development Sociology; former Diné Policy Institute researcher
Incumbent
No
Education
PhD in development sociology; works at the University of Arizona (as stated in the interview)
Interview date
Interview — May 15, 2026 (from Cal Nez’s video series)
Interview status
Interviewed by Cal NezPolitics on the Navajo Nation (2026)
Watch the Cal Nez interviewFacebook pageCampaign website

From the record, in one paragraph:

Their overall approach

Condensed from how they present themselves on the record — the site’s words, their ideas.

Curley is an Associate Professor at the University of Arizona with a PhD in development sociology — the study of the structural forces that limit or expand people's opportunities. From their answers →

Summary

A summary in the site’s words, drawn from the candidate’s recorded interview — not a quotation and not the candidate’s own wording. Their exact words are in the interview video.

Andrew Curley is a member of the Houck Chapter and an Associate Professor at the University of Arizona (PhD in development sociology), running for Navajo Nation President. His interview with Cal Nez centered on land reform, the structure of the government, and the president's role as a manager.

Curley's candidacy is built around governance from the ground up. He believes the Office of the President and Vice President (OPVP) has grown too large, too expensive, and too distant from the chapters where real governance should happen. His proposal to cut OPVP staff roughly in half is not simply a cost-cutting measure. It reflects a philosophical position: the presidency should function as a coordinator, not a power center.

On economic development, Curley explicitly rejects any new uranium mining, arguing that radioactive contamination of land and water is permanent. His alternative framework emphasizes sustainable development grounded in Diné values.

Where they stand
  • Land reform — overhaul the grazing permit system that blocks housing construction across the Nation
  • OPVP reduction — cut the office's staff roughly in half and redirect the savings to unfunded programs
  • Local governance — return authority and resources to the chapter level
  • No new uranium mining — uphold the Diné Natural Resources Protection Act of 2005; pair economic development with sustainability
  • Constitutional development — move toward more accountable elected leadership
Interview Q&A

In the interview, this candidate addressed:

Each link jumps straight to that part of the interview.

In their own words: “I think it’s about time we fundamentally re-examine grazing laws in the Navajo Nation and see how we can open up vast areas of land for home sites, for commercial, for industrial, if that becomes a possibility.”

Read the full interview Q&A →

The interview is the record

Private — your marks stay on this device

Read the interview Q&A →

React 👍😐👎❓, mark Yes / Partly / Evaded, and keep notes as you read — every mark flows into your comparison and My Ballot Notes.

Related issues

Not sure how to weigh what a candidate says? Start with how to evaluate a candidate.

Others running for President
Ask this candidate a question

Community participation — the Consult stage, powered by you

Have a question you’d want Andrew Curley to answer — about housing, health care, your chapter, anything? Submit it here. We work to put community questions in front of candidates through follow-up interviews and campaign contacts. How an answer gets published: an answer appears on this profile only when we can confirm it came from the candidate through their own public channel — a broadcast interview, a campaign statement, or an official account — never through contact details supplied in a submission. Answers publish verbatim, in full. Non-response is never noted, because silence is not evidence. Your question is read by a volunteer, published only as part of a question put to a candidate, and never with anything identifying you.

📤 Shared  


Help improve this profile

Candidates and campaign representatives may submit corrections, biographical information, campaign website and contact details, and photographs they authorize the Diné Civic Center to publish. By submitting materials, you confirm you have the right to share them and grant permission for their use on this site.

Email a correction or addition

My call (private, this device):My shortlist →
Assess this candidate (private)

Your evaluation, not ours — saved on this device only, shown on your Ballot Notes. The job description is in Offices & Qualifications. Criteria informed by the nonpartisan League of Women Voters — see Did They Answer the Question? N/A is always fine.

Do their qualifications fit this job?
Relevant experience — government, business, community?
Do they answer questions directly and fully?
Are their promises realistic?
Communication — clear, respectful, K’é-minded?
Do they listen?
Their accountability & integrity record?