Explore the Issues · Election 2026 Mission
Schools & College
≈ 9 min read · or listen, or skim the bold lines
D · Draft — not verified Not line-checked against the Navajo Nation Code. How we verify →
What Cal asked. To Marcella Yazzie: “In order to continue to support our youth, what would you do to give some sort of a one centralized governance of education?” To J. K. Begay: “Do you want to talk about education? Is there adequate oversight?”
Why this is on the table. Education is the Nation’s future, and the interviews kept returning to a painful pattern the candidates themselves describe: we spend money raising and training our young people, and then they leave for good. We gather and organize what candidates said. We don’t grade it. You decide.
First, the plain facts
Who regulates our schools?
Here’s a question worth knowing the answer to: when a school or college claims to be good, who actually checks? That’s where accreditation comes in.
Accreditation is an independent seal that says a school or college truly meets real standards — in its teaching, its money, its operations. It’s the outside referee. Accreditation is rarely revoked outright — so the warning signs short of losing it (citations, findings, probation) usually tell you more than the seal itself. Still, it has teeth: a school that loses accreditation can lose funding, lose students, even lose the ability to grant real degrees. So accreditation is one of the biggest accountability levers there is — and most people have never had it explained.
A candidate should understand who regulates our schools and what happens when standards slip. Same idea applies to hospitals — see how 638 hospitals are regulated.
Learn what accreditation means: Education 101 · how boards & standards workThe leaving problem
Here’s the heart of it, and candidates named it directly: scholarship money mostly flows to schools off the Nation — which, as one candidate put it, can end up “training our students to leave.”
It’s not that education is bad — it’s that we invest in our young people and then have nowhere for them to come home to. That ties schools straight to jobs and the economy: you can’t ask graduates to return if there’s no work waiting. Education and economic development are the same conversation.
Words to know
The civic map — where accountability is supposed to live
Before asking what’s broken, it helps to know who’s even supposed to be in charge. Here’s the map for education — the at-a-glance version of who keeps schools honest. Why this matters →
What’s the law?Title 10 of the Navajo Nation Code governs education — several candidates call it outdated. Federal education law also applies.Education 101 → — Who regulates it? (the outside referee)Accreditation bodies certify that schools and colleges actually meet standards — the outside referee with real teeth (funding, students, the ability to grant degrees). See the fuller explainer above.
What accreditation means → — Who oversees it? (the inside watchers)Local school boards, the Council’s Education Committee, and the Department of Diné Education.
How boards work → — What’s broken — and what candidates would fixOn this page: the gaps in oversight and the leaving problem — plus how candidates answered, summarized from their interviews.
A starting map — confirm current laws and body names against the Nation’s official resources. General civic information, not legal advice.
What’s broken
- Unequal schools. Big gaps between BIA, grant, and public schools — in resources, broadband, and outcomes.
- Scholarships as a right. Scholarship money flows off-reservation, and graduates don’t come back — because there’s little to come back to.
- An aging law. Title 10 dates back decades — whether it has kept up is a question candidates answered on the record.
- Culture and language at risk. When schooling pulls kids away, the language and teachings can go with them.
What Cal asked candidates — and what they said
Read down the list and see for yourself. Where a candidate didn’t speak to this, we say so plainly — a blank is just a blank, not a mark against anyone.
Melinda Arviso-Ciocco Scholarships as a right · Cal asked: Why does scholarship money leave the Nation?Pushed back on the host’s framing that scholarship money sent off-Nation is “lost” — “we’re not losing money when it comes to scholarships… we’re giving them the opportunity as a human right” — while proposing Diné College and NTU grow into master’s/graduate-degree institutions.Shaquille Begay — Service commitment · Cal asked: Would you support free college for Navajo students?Rather than free tuition, favors service-commitment agreements — help with school in exchange for coming back to work.
J. Kaibah Begay — Modernize Title 10Cal asked: Is there adequate oversight, why are there so many school systems, and how do you fix top-heavy boards?Education is her deepest area — calls for updating Title 10 and the outdated education code, with specifics.
Debbie Nez-Manuel — Close the gaps · Cal asked: How do you unify a fractured education system?Would address disparities among BIA, grant, and public schools — including through broadband. Marcella Yazzie638 schools · Cal asked: Should the different school types be consolidated?Explained tribally-controlled (638) and charter schools, and how she’d support them.
Eugene Badonie — Personal responsibility · Cal asked: What's your view on education?Stresses personal responsibility — that students who fail often didn’t do the work.
(Each name jumps to that candidate’s answer. Other candidates’ views are on their own pages; where someone didn’t speak to schools, their page notes “did not provide an answer” on this.)
Donovan Begay · Cal asked: Should scholarship money stay on the Nation to grow our two colleges?Framed scholarships as preparing students for the wider world rather than as a tool to make them return; shared his own repeatedly-denied-scholarship story; pledged to fund a scholarship for every college student he can.Notice the pattern — one failure, many masks
The gaps in our schools aren’t an education-only story. They’re one face of a pattern that runs under every topic: no one truly watching whether the people in charge are qualified and doing the job.
In schools: no one reliably watching accreditation → standards slip, futures lost. In 638 health care: the same root → weak oversight, exposure to fraud. See it → In the enterprises: a yearly allowance instead of growth.It’s often one problem in seven places. See the root — Accountability & Justice →
How should schools balance keeping long-term teachers with filling empty classrooms right now?
Take the workforce survey →The different stances — pick the one closest to yours
How would we measure success?
A plan only matters if you can tell whether it’s working. Here are specific things to watch on this topic — so “we fixed it” means the numbers moved, not just that a law passed.
What to measure- Graduation rates by school type (BIA, grant, public)
- Share of graduates who return to work on the Nation
- Broadband access by school
- Whether each school/college holds current accreditation
Gather from school boards, the education department, and accreditation bodies — reported per chapter so gaps are visible. What success looks like
Smaller gaps between schools, more graduates coming home, full broadband, and no accreditation in jeopardy.
Ask any candidate: how would you measure whether this is working? A real leader can name the number.
Questions to ask any candidate
- How do we keep our graduates from leaving for good?
- Who regulates our schools — and what happens when one slips below standard?
- What would you change in Title 10, specifically?
- How do Diné language and teachings fit into schooling?
Go deeper on this subject
- Education 101 — the full background, including accreditation.
- Economic Development — the jobs graduates would come home to.
- Healthcare & 638 — the same regulation question, for hospitals.
- Glossary.
- Watch the interviews.
Now meet the candidates
- Candidate profiles
- Full interview write-ups
- Watch the interviews
Healthcare & 638All 7 topics · Next →
Veterans
Your part — do something with this
Reading is step one. Here’s a concrete move on this topic: Attend (or run for) your local school board, and ask candidates who checks whether your schools meet standards.
This is a conversation — keep it going
You help decide what gets explored next — who Cal interviews, what questions get asked, what topics we dig into.
Send an idea → Join the conversation →
Built with the people — and someday, by them.
Take this to the ballot box
Voting information — the same on every issue page
You've read where the candidates stand on this issue — here's when you can act on it. Primary Election: Tuesday, July 21, 2026 (early in-person voting runs through July 17; absentee ballot requests due Monday, July 6 at 5 pm). General Election: Tuesday, November 3, 2026 (register by September 24; includes the constitution referendum). Full details, deadlines, polling info, and official NEA contacts live on one page so nothing here goes stale:
Related
All issues · Candidates — the directory · Election Mission · Civic Academy · My Civic Journey
This issue continues as a Mission
The election is one decision — the challenge outlives it. Join the ongoing mission →
The law behind it, and what 33 candidates said: The law says the language shall be taught →