The record, read closely · issue articles

They came home to a waiting list

≈ 6 min read · or listen, or skim the bold lines

D · Draft — not verified   Every quote is verbatim from a candidate’s own turn. Quotes are their claims, not this site’s findings. Where a candidate describes a family member, they raised it themselves, on the record, unprompted. How we verify →

Companion page: where the candidates stand on this, one by one →

Veterans reach substantive discussion in 23 of the 42 interviews, and Cal Nez raises the subject in twenty of them. Twenty-two of the 42 candidates speak about veterans at length. It is the one subject on this site where the candidates do not really disagree — and that agreement, it turns out, is the finding.

The promise everyone makes

Nearly every candidate says veterans deserve support. Christopher Curley: “I’m going to hold myself accountable to this, to advocate for our veterans and their families.” Jerilynn Yazzie: Navajo veterans “deserve all the support from our people.” Melinda Arviso Ciocco offers the greeting the Nation gives its returning soldiers: “welcome home.”

Johnny Russell Jr. says the quiet part in the same breath as the promise: “I don’t use the veterans for an excuse to get elected here… Don’t just use the veterans for an excuse to get in there.”

FINDING When everyone agrees, agreement stops carrying information. The useful question is not whether a candidate supports veterans. It is what specific thing they name — a fund, a form, a facility, an office. Below, only what they named.

The paperwork

Johnny Russell Jr. describes the machinery that defeats people: on an application, “one letter wrong or one number wrong. You have to redo the whole application.” Laurelle Sheppard locates the same failure as a knowledge gap: many veterans qualify for benefits, but “how they’re going to access some of those benefits… is definitely an area that needs improvement.” Lewnell Harrison names it plainly: “there’s a lot of red tape,” and proposes going out to find veterans rather than waiting for them to arrive — “let’s go to our veterans… a lot of them are disabled, some of them suffer from” post-traumatic stress, “and some of them are just elderly.”

What waiting actually looks like

Two candidates put their own families in the record, unasked.

Lewnell Harrison, about his father: “I know my father, Marine. He requested for a home like 15 years ago through the veterans office and he kept telling me, oh yeah, they’re gonna build me a home this year. They’re gonna build me a home.”

Andrienna Lister, about her father: he “still deals with the PTSD,” and “it costs a lot of money.” She remembers her mother going to the veterans office in Window Rock to ask for help with funding. And she states the structural view most candidates skirt: “Ultimately, I believe the federal government should be the one taking care of our veterans, but that is not the situation.”

And Donovan Begay, himself a veteran, describes reaching out for help while raising four children alone: he “reached out to the veteran programs here on the Navajo Nation, and they really didn’t have anything. They didn’t have any sort of answers on where to go.”

Approach: the trust fund

Eula Yazzie recalls creating trust funds “for the veterans, elders, for education.” Jamie Henio explains the mechanism — every year, from any revenue source, “a few cents would go to that veteran’s trust fund” — and immediately calls for an assessment of where it stands. He also raises the oversight question directly: at a Council session, the question was asked who has oversight of the Veterans Affairs director.

Approach: facilities, or the lack of them

Arvin Trujillo states a fact the record does not dispute: “we don’t have veteran facilities here on the nation. And so our veterans have to travel different parts of the country to go and get the necessary services.” He is careful to add that rural veterans elsewhere face the same distances. Andy Nez describes what he did in office: formally adopting chapter and agency veteran organizations into Title 2 — “which has never been done before” — after about a year of advocacy.

Approach: make Washington keep its promise

Titus J. Nez wants the Nation to lobby the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, and to remind “every new administration, that you have a duty responsibility to provide services, health services to the veterans” — noting that Native Americans, including Navajo people, serve at the highest rate of any ethnic group. And then the balance: “if it does come time to help our veterans, then the Navajo Nation should get involved… not just say, put them as another group of people.”

FINDING Andrienna Lister’s sentence is the whole policy question in twenty words: the federal government should be the one taking care of Navajo veterans, and it is not. Every proposal above answers that gap differently — press Washington harder, build here, fund the trust, fix the forms. A voter’s real choice is which of those a candidate will actually spend a year on.

What nobody said

FINDING

No candidate said how many Diné veterans are waiting for housing, how many claims the Navajo Nation Veterans Administration has pending, or how long the average wait is. Nobody could, because those numbers do not appear to be published anywhere. Jamie Henio came closest, asking who has oversight of the Veterans Affairs director; Eula Yazzie and he both called for an assessment of the trust fund.

This is the site’s recurring shape, in its most painful form. A father waits fifteen years for a house. A veteran finds no answers at the veterans office. And the number of people in that same line is not something the Nation publishes — so no candidate can promise to shorten it, and no voter can check whether they did. What should be public.

Open items across the whole site, sorted by who owns them: The Work →

Up a level: What runs through all of it →