The record, read closely · issue articles
Half the Nation lives somewhere else
≈ 6 min read · or listen, or skim the bold lines
D · Draft — not verified Every quote is verbatim from a candidate’s own turn. Figures candidates cite are their claims, not this site’s findings, and are labeled as such. How we verify →
What Cal asked. He keeps every Diné in the frame — to Charlie Smith Jr.: “400 and something thousand Navajos that are living on the reservation or off the reservation beyond your chapter.” Healthcare away from the Nation, urban development, off-reservation land — all his questions.
A number to chase. Cal’s recurring figures — about 1,963 fully Navajo-owned businesses against 91,000+ residents working off the Nation — are his as spoken; this project could not locate their public source.
Cal Nez raises members living off the Nation in 25 of the 41 interviews where his questions can be identified. Eighteen of the 42 candidates engage with it. They are talking about their own relatives, and about a fact the Nation’s government has never fully absorbed.
Titus J. Nez says it directly: finding a solution for people who live off the reservation matters “only because half of the Navajo people live off the reservation now.”
The sentence that should stop a room
FINDING
Andrienna Lister, thinking about representation across districts, arrives somewhere most discussions never reach: “those that live off the nation are not even represented, but they’re a part of the population.” Her conclusion is not rhetorical — she proposes adding delegates to represent them, and calls the current arrangement “not consistent… not fair… not equal.”
Consider what that means. If roughly half of Diné citizens live off the Nation, and the Council is apportioned among 110 chapters on the Nation, then a large share of the people the government exists to serve elect no one to it. They may vote in the presidential race — eligibility rules are the Election Administration’s to state, not ours — but no delegate’s district is theirs. This site can find no candidate but Lister who names that as a structural problem.
Treaty rights and the line on the map
Greg Bigman describes reading the Treaty of 1868 when he first ran for president, and finding what was not in it: “our treaty rights are only for those that are living on the reservation, because when you go off the reservation, it’s temporary. And so it makes this assumption that we’re supposed to be here on the reservation.”
Titus J. Nez reads the same document the other way — that people in the cities should be taught “that services can be provided, and the obligation from the Treaty of 1868 should be upheld.”
FINDING Two candidates, one treaty, opposite conclusions about whether its promises follow a Diné person across a line drawn in 1868. Neither is obviously wrong, and the Nation has not resolved it. That unresolved question governs whether half the population is a constituency or a diaspora. Read it yourself — the Treaty is short, and it is on the site’s law pages.
Health care that stops at the line
Marsha Greyeyes proposes the most concrete fix in the record, and frames it as a demand rather than a request — the Nation and other tribal governments should not ask but require that the federal government implement health insurance for tribal members so that “whether they’re on the reservation or off the reservation, whether they’re in Virginia and Salt Lake and Maryland, that their insurance card is valid in any of those areas to receive care. And their bill is paid by IHS.”
Melinda Arviso Ciocco states the principle: “no matter where we go, no matter where we are, urban, non-urban, on and off the reservation, we all deserve health care.” Christopher Curley asks the operational question — how the Nation adequately provides health care for those living off the reservation. And Greg Bigman describes what happens without a system: patients “get shopped around on Navajo, going from one facility to the next and even off reservation.”
The dollar that leaves
Andrew Curley, who calls himself “an urban Indian, urban Native,” describes where salaries earned in Window Rock are spent: “they spend it in border towns.” He cites, as an informal survey from around 2005, an estimate that 78% of every dollar earned on the Navajo Nation goes to border-town spending — and immediately invites the listener to test it against their own habits: “where are you buying your stuff?”
FINDING That 78% figure is a candidate’s recollection of an informal survey roughly two decades old, offered as such. This project has not located the study and does not repeat the number as fact. We print it because the shape of the claim — that most Navajo earnings are spent off the Nation — recurs across the record in other voices. Marcella Yazzie describes a non-Navajo entrepreneur doing business on the Nation whose payout mostly leaves it. Joan Gray describes Navajo jewelers and artisans traveling off-Nation to sell to non-Natives, when “we could be hosting all these art shows here.” Nobody has measured this. Somebody should.
Approach: bring them home — or serve them there
The record splits, quietly, into two philosophies. Christopher Curley wants to fix the house first: “taking care of our own house and our own front yard” so people can thrive here — while insisting the Nation means “even the people that live in the cities… to be able to represent them as a whole, as one.” Christopher D. White wants the schools and counseling built here, so that “we don’t have to go off reservation to go to schools.” Marcella Yazzie says pay is the lever: raise the pay scale so a provider need not leave.
Donovan Begay describes those already gone: “they’re out there in the cities on their own, trying to make ends meet,” and would send resources and information to young parents living in cities — housing, food programs, outreach. Titus J. Nez would teach people in the cities that services exist at all.
What nobody said
FINDING
No candidate said how many Diné citizens live off the Nation today, or where. Titus J. Nez offered a figure and then corrected himself mid-sentence, which is the honest behavior of a person working from memory rather than a report. No candidate named a Navajo Nation office responsible for members living away, or a program budget line for them.
So the largest constituency in the Nation — by several candidates’ own account, about half of it — has no counted population, no dedicated representation, no settled treaty answer, and no office. Everything else in this article follows from that.
TAKE ACTION
Ask the question nobody has answered
To any candidate: “How many Diné citizens live off the Nation, and who in the Navajo Nation government is responsible for them?” And, if they are running for Council: “Should members living off the Nation have representation? If not, why are they citizens?” Their full interviews: the candidate pages. If you live off the Nation and have tried to get services, tell us what happened on Participate — anonymously, combined counts only.
Up a level: What runs through all of it →